Login    
 
 
 
 
Text/HTML
  
You are here :: Blogs Saturday, May 19, 2012

Search
Note: This uses the internal blog search engine. The Google search engine is also available at the top of the page.
  
Disclaimer

Please review the site disclaimer before downloading or using content found on this site

  
Categories
  
DEVSHED Blog
As always, I welcome your comments!
Feb 15

Written by: Steve Gray
2/15/2010 4:24 PM  RssIcon

That was a mouthful.

I have developed a stored procedure that dumps all code from a SQL database into a text file. Sounds boring, but I use it all the time. Really. Case in point – I have performance issues at a client that started out small, and now has table that has millions of records.

I’ll just ignore the comments that ‘I should have anticipated that’, or ‘I should have used scalable coding techniques’. You’re right and I should have. But here I am. I need to retroactively employ scalable coding techniques in a data base that has almost 1000 objects (mostly stored procedures). More specifically, I need to be sure that all the SELECT statements use the (NOLOCK) hint.

 

So, I’m searching my text file for all lines that have ‘FROM’, but don’t have ‘(NOLOCK)’. Also I’ll need lines that have ‘JOIN’ but don’t have ‘(NOLOCK)’.

The solution is to use a text editor that supports REGEX searching, like EditPadPro, and search for this regex:

^((?!nolock).)*from((?!nolock).)*$

Explaining how it works is beyond the scope of this blog entry… but it does.

If you don’t have any of the products from http://www.just-great-software.com/, you’re working too hard.

Tags:
Categories:
Location: Blogs Parent Separator DEVSHED Blogs Child Separator SQL

1 comment(s) so far...


Gravatar

Re: Regex: Searching for lines that have one string but are missing another

When I feed this regex into WinGrep 2.3, WinGrep errors out saying that this is an invalid use of a repeat.

findstr (under win2K3 R2) accepts it as a search string, but does not return results from files which I know to have matches via a manual search.

So far, I am 0/2 with this regex.

By jb on   4/22/2010 2:10 PM
As always, I welcome your comments!
  
 
 
Home | Products | Blogs | Contact Us | Links | God's Plan
Privacy Statement | Terms Of Use
 
Copyright 2011 by Devshed.us